View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2002 9:20 pm1 Post subject: Distributed.Net Tidbits....
|
Next
|
|
I noticed that the OGR stats run did not happen last night so decided to check the /plan and bovine had posted the following which includes the explanation for the lack of OGR statitics last night and hints at the start up of RC5-72.
:: 30-Nov-2002 23:49 GMT (Saturday) ::
I've just put some additional release candidate clients on the
pre-release page http://www1.distributed.net/download/prerelease.html
dnetc478-bsdos2-x86-aout.tar.gz
dnetc478-bsdos4-x86-elf.tar.gz
dnetc478-linux-arm-elf.tar.gz
dnetc478-linux-x86-elf-pthreads.tar.gz
dnetc478-netbsd-mipsel.tar.gz
dnetc478-openbsd-sparc-aout.tar.gz
dnetc478c-os2-x86.zip
Note that we are providing the linux-x86-elf-pthreads client as an
alternate to the traditional linux-x86-elf client (which uses forking
and shared-memory as its execution model). The pthreads client should
still be considered for use specifically on systems that have problems
with shared-memory usage (such as clusters that utilize MOSIX for
process migration), since our forked-model client still has greater
code maturity.
It's been pointed out by a number of people that some of the clients
on the pre-release page have been available there for more than 4
days. That threshold is intended to merely be a guidance for the
approximate amount of time, and not a hard-set time period. Formal
release of those clients and the formal start of RC5-72 is soon
forthcoming but is awaiting coordination with a number of staff to
ensure everything begins smoothly.
Additionally, OGR stats processing will probably not occur tonight
since Decibel is out of town and I need him to manually re-process a
couple of today's logfiles before resuming the automation.
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 12:59 pm3 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
Just noticed the statiatics for RC5-72 and OGR-25 are back online and up-to-date.
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chinasaur
Junior Scribe
Joined: 12 Dec 2002
Posts: 69
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 1:33 pm4 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
I like OGR..I ran it exclusively vs RC5..but the thing that makes me laugh are the graphs...they haven't been updated since 2000.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:24 am5 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
Chinasaur wrote: |
I like OGR..I ran it exclusively vs RC5..but the thing that makes me laugh are the graphs...they haven't been updated since 2000. |
I've never really paid much attention to thier graphs, but suspect they were more interested in the RC5 line of work than OGR and let them fall to the back burner.
I've also noticed there is not much interest in the new RC5-72 project, I guess it is expected after all the time spent on RC5-64, but I will not knock any project that members of the team wish to run. After all it is thier machines and money being used and if they choose to run it then we need to support them as much as possible.
Now to the point of this post
I recently moved to this home( last part of Sept.} that I'm now living in and have not set the whole network up due to a lack of time, need of some parts and fear of the outrageous electric bills as I had at the old home. But having now recieved my second full months bill which is considerable less than expected again I'm ready to bring my old RC5 fleet back online. However this time I am wanting to run it on OGR. The problem is this small fleet of systems ( K6-2's, K6-3's and PII's) will not be on my network and I need to know if it is feasble t run OGR by sneakernetting the workunits, and if so can it be managed on floppies? Or is it not worth the time and trouble with these old machines?
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chinasaur
Junior Scribe
Joined: 12 Dec 2002
Posts: 69
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:45 am6 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
Beyond,
Found this on sneakernetting on dnet - http://n0cgi.distributed.net/faq/cache/59.html
As for the old machines...doesn't seem worth the extra electricity to run them...I wouldn't if they were mine. A K62 or 3 doesn't do much work compared to a modern proc.
Either way..you have an enviable problem...too many computers to hook up
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:56 am7 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
You are more than likely right, best just dump them and save till I can afford to build new boxes. Anyone need any used but not abused old parts?
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chinasaur
Junior Scribe
Joined: 12 Dec 2002
Posts: 69
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 1:09 pm8 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
Post what you have and I'll see if I want any of it.
Also, I know a lady who's son's Jr High might want some of it...so I'd buy some for them.
Let's see what ya got.
Also, it will all most likely run BeOS so it's always good to keep legacy hardware around...especially with Intel and M$ coming up with the trustworthy computing/Palladium initiative ... in the future...you may only be able to buy a computer that runs M$...they will have paid the US lawmakers to outlaw open source and non-DRM protected HW.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2002 1:49 am9 Post subject:
|
Previous Next
|
|
Chinasaur wrote: |
Also, it will all most likely run BeOS so it's always good to keep legacy hardware around...especially with Intel and M$ coming up with the trustworthy computing/Palladium initiative ... in the future...you may only be able to buy a computer that runs M$...they will have paid the US lawmakers to outlaw open source and non-DRM protected HW. |
I do not keep up with M$ so have no idea what this Palladium thingy is, care to enlighten me?
I have been thinking that I might go ahead and bring the higher MHz systems back online, it is better than nothing or pulling power away from SOB for the time being. Probably just the 400-500's which would give me around 2.5-3.0 GHz for OGR.
If you can wait till after the holidays I will do a complete inventory and post it here then.
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beyond
Junior Scribe
Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2002 2:24 am10 Post subject:
|
Previous
|
|
from bovine's .plan;
:: 17-Dec-2002 09:36 GMT (Tuesday) ::
Several additional clients have graduated from release-candidate
status to formal release availability on the download page:
dnetc478-riscos-arm
dnetc478-irix6.5-mips
dnetc478-netbsd-arm32
dnetc478-linux-sparc
dnetc478a-linux-arm-elf
A few new release candidates have been added to the pre-release page:
dnetc478-dos-x86
dnetc478-linux-x86-elf-glibc20
dnetc478-nto2-arm
dnetc478-nto2-x86
dnetc478-ps2linux-mipsel
dnetc478-qnx4-x86
dnetc478-win16-x86
Also the proxyinfo monitoring pages have been updated to support a
more modern backend infrastructure, but we have tried to keep the
presentation approximately the same. You can see the new RC5-72
proxyinfo (updated at 5 minute intervals) page at:
http://n0cgi.distributed.net/rc5-proxyinfo.html
http://n0cgi.distributed.net/ogr-proxyinfo.html
The random, useless factoids at the top of the proxyinfo page are
indeed outdated and need to be replaced with more interesting quotes
(I've merely translated the old 1998 quotes/scripts into modern XSL).
If you have cute ideas for *positive*, general interest quotes, I'm
willing to accept suggestions at . (Preferably
try to keep them project neutral so that they'll work for RC5-72 keys
or OGR nodes.) For the curious, saved copies of the two input files
that generate the above proxyinfo page are:
http://www1.distributed.net/~bovine/proxyinfo2.xsl
http://www1.distributed.net/~bovine/proxyinfo.xml (stale input data)
_________________
-=Beyond=-
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|